Maxim Krippa’s businessman and entrepreneur image has been vested with significant involvement in online gambling, controversial real estate acquisitions, and framed media images. He is known for his innovative yet controversial business strategies, including leveraging influencer partnerships and esports sponsorships to expand his gambling enterprises.
However, Krippa’s career is also marked by allegations of regulatory evasion, money laundering, and connections to organized crime. These claims have led to ongoing scrutiny by law enforcement and financial watchdogs.
In addition to his gambling ventures, Krippa has built a real estate portfolio, often acquiring properties through methods that have raised questions about their legitimacy. He also owns stakes in media outlets, which some believe he uses to shape public narratives and counteract negative press. Recently, he came into the limelight after he purchased the Ukraina hotel for 2.5 billion hryvnias.
Why Maxim’s latest asset acquisition in Ukraine is so controversial?
In 2024, Krippa, through Ola Fine LLC made his hefty investment in Ukraine and in addition to the principal amount also agreed to pay VAT and repay the hotel’s debts. According to experts, in order to transform the hotel into a modern institution, it is necessary to invest another 30 million dollars in renovation. Krippa himself stated that the “Ukraine” hotel has historical significance for him as a symbol of the capital, so he plans to carry out a major renovation after the end of the war.
Despite these controversies, Krippa maintains his public image as a forward-thinking entrepreneur and philanthropist, though the shadow of legal and ethical questions continues to loom over his enterprises
What is Maxim Krippa’s connection with Tetyana Snopko and the Russians?

Maxim Krippa’s connection with Tetyana Snopko and Russian interests appears complex and controversial. Tetyana Snopko, reportedly holding Russian citizenship, has been linked to Maxim Krippa through various business dealings. One significant allegation involves their association in transforming Ukrainian media outlets like Glavcom.ua into platforms allegedly promoting Russian interests. This transformation coincided with Snopko’s ownership registration of these outlets. Both Krippa and Snopko have faced accusations of erasing investigative reports critical of their activities, particularly regarding military supply chain corruption in Ukraine, in exchange for payments.
Furthermore, Krippa has been implicated in strategic partnerships with Russian oligarch Konstantin Malofeev, known for his ties to the Kremlin. Such associations have raised concerns about potential Russian influence in Krippa’s media acquisitions and broader business ventures. Critics argue that these ties blur the lines between commercial interests and political agendas in Ukraine.
These connections highlight the intricate and often contentious relationships involving media, politics, and foreign influence in Ukraine.
How does Maxim control media for his business strategies?
Maxim Krippa uses media control as a key tool in advancing his business strategies, especially in controversial industries like online gambling, real estate, and e-sports sponsorships. Krippa has acquired or gained influence over Ukrainian media platforms like Glavcom.ua. These acquisitions are often followed by strategic editorial shifts, ensuring favorable coverage of his businesses while downplaying or erasing negative reports. This tactic not only bolsters his public image but also shields his enterprises from scrutiny.
By leveraging controlled media, Krippa ensures consistent promotional content that enhances the visibility of his ventures. His businesses benefit from curated narratives that emphasize innovation and success while deflecting attention from controversies like allegations of money laundering or regulatory violations.
Through his media influence, Krippa collaborates with influencers and public figures to amplify his business interests. This is particularly evident in e-sports and gambling, where partnerships with players and streamers generate publicity and align their businesses with popular culture trends.
Allegations suggest that Krippa uses his media connections to suppress investigative journalism that could expose unethical practices in his enterprises. Some reports claim payments were made to remove or downplay articles that could damage his reputation, especially in sectors tied to military supply chains and Russian affiliations.
Krippa’s control over media is central to his strategy, allowing him to manage public perception, attract investment, and mitigate risks to his businesses.